<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Tech Voice &#187; FCC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.artvoice.com/techvoice/tag/fcc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.artvoice.com/techvoice</link>
	<description>Science, tech, computers, gadgets and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 19:53:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The Great Digital Delay</title>
		<link>http://blogs.artvoice.com/techvoice/2009/01/27/the-great-digital-delay/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.artvoice.com/techvoice/2009/01/27/the-great-digital-delay/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 16:59:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anthony</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AT&T]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[barack obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coupon program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dtv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dtv transition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[us senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[verizon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.artvoice.com/techvoice/?p=312</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This morning, in an unanimous vote, the U.S. Senate has agreed to delay the government mandated digital television transition. The target has been moved from the original February 17th date to June 12th.
(Updated: The bill has been voted down in the house. More info at the bottom.)
Media reports have been all over the map, with [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-313" title="23181544" src="http://blogs.artvoice.com/techvoice/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/23181544-275x300.jpg" alt="23181544" width="275" height="300" />This morning, in an unanimous vote, the U.S. Senate has agreed to delay the government mandated digital television transition. The target has been moved from the original February 17th date to June 12th.</p>
<p><strong>(Updated:</strong> The bill has been voted down in the house. More info at the bottom.)</p>
<p>Media reports have been all over the map, with sources suggesting anywhere from 5 million to 20 million US households are unprepared for the transition.  There have also been reports of as many as 2.5 million on the FCC&#8217;s waiting list for their converter box coupon program.  13.5 million coupons have been passed out, but it&#8217;s estimated that roughly half have not been used.  The coupons carry a 90 day expiration, and as the unused coupons expire those on the waiting list will get a shot at one.</p>
<p>President Obama has called for an additional $850 million as part of his stimulus package to provide additional funding to the FCC coupon program.</p>
<p>The FCC has of course already auctioned off and collected it&#8217;s nearly $20 billion dollars to re-license the wireless spectrum that would have been freed in just 3 weeks.  (Why again, does the FCC need another $850 million of taxpayer&#8217;s dollars to cover the coupon shortfall? Anyway&#8230;)</p>
<p>Major players AT&amp;T and Verizon will have to wait until June to begin using their newly acquired slice of the airwaves, though this morning&#8217;s bill includes a 116 day extension to the end of their original licenses as compensation.</p>
<p>(Shameless plug warning: who needs OTA anyway, when you&#8217;ve got <a href="http://video.artvoice.com">Artvoice TV</a>?)</p>
<p><strong>Update, Wednesday Jan 28</strong>: Despite the unanimous vote and the support from President Obama, it turns out this bill was not a shoo-in after all. Because the bill had been fast-tracked in the House, it required 2/3rds votet here before reaching the President&#8217;s desk; however, this morning it was shot down by a 256 to 168 vote. So it&#8217;s not over yet folks. The House may vote next week for a second time on the issue. In the mean time, we can say the great digital delay&#8230; has been delayed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.artvoice.com/techvoice/2009/01/27/the-great-digital-delay/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Post Election Bits &amp; Bytes</title>
		<link>http://blogs.artvoice.com/techvoice/2008/11/07/post-election-bits-bytes/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.artvoice.com/techvoice/2008/11/07/post-election-bits-bytes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 05:02:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anthony</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anonymous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[barack obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[china]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cnn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cyber crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eric schmidt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hacking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hologram]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[john mccain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[julius genchowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[msnbc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[presidential elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reed hundt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sarah palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sonal shah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[white space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.artvoice.com/techvoice/?p=242</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Election &#8216;08 is now in the history books &#8211; so I figured it&#8217;s time to take a look backward, and a look forward at some relevant headlines.
Hacking Democracy
First, we&#8217;ll take a look at one of the best kept secrets of the campaign season, from both sides, care of a Newsweek article published just today.  Over [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Election &#8216;08 is now in the history books &#8211; so I figured it&#8217;s time to take a look backward, and a look forward at some relevant headlines.</p>
<p><strong>Hacking Democracy</strong></p>
<p>First, we&#8217;ll take a look at one of the best kept secrets of the campaign season, from both sides, care of a Newsweek article published just today.  Over the summer, the FBI had its hands full with simultaneous cyber crime investigations: the hacking of the Obama campaign computer system(s), and the hacking of the McCain campaign computer system(s).  While the intrusions have been acknowledged,  little else has been released or confirmed yet.  At this point, it&#8217;s known for sure that the FBI was involved, that &#8220;a large number of files&#8221; were stolen from the Obama side, and that the attacks came from a &#8220;foreign entity&#8221; and definitely did not come from the opposing sides.  The McCain campaign systems were intruded on in a similar fashion as the Obama systems, but the extent of the compromise on their side was unmentioned.  The rest is speculation of course: security experts have suggested the attacks likely came from China or Russia, and anyone&#8217;s best guess is that the goal of such an intrusion was to gain an inside line on procedures and policies used by the campaigns for a leg up in future dealings with the to-be president. (<a href="http://www.newsweek.com/id/167581" target="_blank">H/T</a> to Newsweek)</p>
<p>This of course wasn&#8217;t the only politically motivated cyber-crime this campaign season &#8211; I&#8217;m sure many recall the <a href="http://blogs.artvoice.com/techvoice/2008/09/17/hackers-break-into-sarah-palins-inbox/">Sarah Palin e-mail intrusion</a> back in September.  Though it&#8217;s significance is near nil at this point, we&#8217;ll remember it as the day our servers felt the shock wave of a web traffic explosion.  If anyone is still interested: David Kernell, a college student in Tennessee, and the son of Tennessee democratic representiative Mike Kernell, was indicted by grand jury in late October.  His trial begins on December 16th, and faces up to 5 years and fines.  Not so &#8220;anonymous&#8221; now, eh David?  A court has also ordered the e-mails in both of governor Palin&#8217;s Yahoo! accounts be preserved for further investigation.</p>
<p>Another dishonorable mention is the state of Ohio election information and registration website that also came under attack, and experienced some brief downtime in late October.  (H/T to <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/domesticNews/idUSTRE49K96820081021" target="_blank">Reuters</a>)</p>
<p><strong>Technology Promises</strong></p>
<p>I also want to give a nod back to another item I&#8217;ve talked about here: <a href="http://blogs.artvoice.com/techvoice/2008/09/15/the-presidential-candidates-on-science-technology/">Science Debate 2008</a>.  We&#8217;ve got a list of policies and action-items promised to us from pre-president-elect Obama in the realm of technology.  I&#8217;ll be <a href="http://www.sciencedebate2008.com/www/index.php?id=42" target="_blank">saving a copy</a> and keeping score for the next four to eight years.</p>
<p>Along the same lines is Obama&#8217;s &#8220;Blueprint for Change&#8221; video on technology issues.  Maybe you missed it?  Don&#8217;t feel bad; for whatever reason, this wasn&#8217;t released until the night before the election, effectively burying it in the rest of the 11th hour buzz.</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="425" height="344" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/INo69f7f8bo&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/INo69f7f8bo&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p><strong>Hi-Tech Election Day Coverage</strong></p>
<p>Election night itself was a grand display of technology as well.  CNN debuted it&#8217;s new &#8220;hologram&#8221; technology &#8211; much to the chagrin of pocket protector pencil neck purists who are still complaining two days later that the effect isn&#8217;t actually a hologram.  &#8220;True&#8221; hologram or not, I personally found it a bit silly.  We&#8217;ll see if CNN or others bother with this technique down the road.</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="425" height="344" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/thOxW19vsTg&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/thOxW19vsTg&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p>Ratings speak volumes though, and CNN enjoyed second place of 14 major networks covering the event with 12.3 million viewers.  ABC was the victor, at just over 13 million viewers.  In all, it&#8217;s estimated about 71 million viewers tuned in on Tuesday to watch the results unfold.  As impressive at it sounds, it&#8217;s still over 25 million shy of this year&#8217;s past Super Bowl.  Apparently the world&#8217;s couch potatoes are still more interested in the Patriots than in patriotism. (<a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/more-than-71-million-tuned-in-for-election-night-coverage/" target="_blank">Nielsen&#8217;s complete ratings here</a>.)</p>
<p>Nielsen also kept an eye to the web to gauge coverage ratings in cyberspace.  There&#8217;s a comprehensive list <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/at-polls-and-online-americans-joined-election-day-fray/" target="_blank">here</a> if interested; CNN, MSNBC and Yahoo! News being the top three destinations for surfers on Tuesday. The official campaign sites also received a boost on Tuesday, with Obama&#8217;s site receiving 1.2 million unique visitors, and McCain&#8217;s site receiving 479,000 unique visitors.</p>
<p><strong>The Future</strong></p>
<p>Lastly, let&#8217;s look ahead to some new developments that will affect us going forward.</p>
<p>While not related to presidential politics per se, this is still a governmental policy decision that flew under the radar with all the elections buzz, that could mean huge developments in the wireless arena.  On Tuesday, the FCC approved a measure to free up &#8220;white spaces&#8221; for unlicensed (read: free but regulated) use.  In short, this means unused areas of the wireless spectrum in the general area of digital TV transmissions can be used by consumer devices.  This coveted piece of intangible mathematical electromagnetic real estate means higher bandwidth (faster) transmission of information to and from consumer devices, at greater distances than the current public bands allow.  It&#8217;s been a long fought battle mostly centered around issues of interference with licensed bands (at least, that&#8217;s the PR friendly argument &#8211; it&#8217;s probably been a long fought battle because telecommunications companies have sunk billions into competing technologies that may have just been rendered obsolete.)  To appease the interference complaints (some of which are probably valid), devices will have to be extremely smart: they&#8217;ll be required to be GPS aware, and to communicate over the Internet with a central database to announce their position and ask permission for an interference free frequency.  There&#8217;s a loophole for less intelligent devices, though they&#8217;ll have to pass some pretty rigorous interference tests.  You can read more <a href="http://www.bizjournals.com/sanfrancisco/stories/2008/11/03/daily62.html" target="_blank">here</a>.  Dell claims to have laptops with &#8220;white space radio&#8221; already in the works that you can learn about <a href="http://tech.yahoo.com/blogs/null/110134" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
<p>The last &#8220;bit&#8221; we have to pass on is some news about some technology related appointments to the Obama transition team.  Named to the team include Google philanthropy officer Sonal Shah, and Julius Genchowski who is a former IAC executive and former chief council to former FCC chairman Reed Hundt.  Rumors abound about Google CEO Eric Schmidt may be in the running for U.S. Chief Technology Advisor as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.artvoice.com/techvoice/2008/11/07/post-election-bits-bytes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Digital Television in Buffalo</title>
		<link>http://blogs.artvoice.com/techvoice/2008/09/09/digital-television-in-buffalo/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.artvoice.com/techvoice/2008/09/09/digital-television-in-buffalo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 16:58:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anthony</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antenna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[buffalo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[converter box]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dtv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hdtv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[north carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UHF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wilmington]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.artvoice.com/techvoice/?p=108</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the flip of a giant 7-foot tall symbolic switch, FCC chairman Kevin Martin and mayor Bill Saffo officially announced the city of Wilmington, North Carolina as the first to make the transition from analog to digital TV.  This switch is mandated by the government this coming February, 17, 2009, and Wilmington has graciously volunteered [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the flip of a giant 7-foot tall symbolic switch, FCC chairman Kevin Martin and mayor Bill Saffo officially announced the city of Wilmington, North Carolina as the first to make the transition from analog to digital TV.  This switch is mandated by the government this coming February, 17, 2009, and Wilmington has graciously volunteered to be the nation&#8217;s guinea pig.  (<a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=94407491" target="_blank">More coverage on the Wilmington switch here.</a>)  Digital TV will provide better quality picture and sound, but the transition won&#8217;t be without some headaches.</p>
<p>So this had me thinking &#8211; if Wilmington is already there, where does Buffalo stand?</p>
<p>There&#8217;s millions of dollars allocated to raise public awareness on the switch in the coming months &#8211; so expect to hear more about it.  There&#8217;s also over a billion dollars allocated to help you cope&#8230; and a lot of them have gone un-spent so far.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a couple tips and things you want to know if you haven&#8217;t gotten up to speed on the switch to digital yet.</p>
<p><span id="more-108"></span></p>
<p><strong>Q: Do I need to take any action?<br />
</strong></p>
<p><strong>A: </strong>If you&#8217;re a subscriber to a paid service like cable or dish, you&#8217;re all set already.  Your cable box or dish tuner is digital capable, and perhaps has been for years.  If you&#8217;ve purchased a new television in the past few years, you&#8217;re probably OK too.  Just about every HDTV manufactured is digital (DTV) capable &#8211; but not ALL &#8211; so if you jumped on board the HDTV bandwagon early on, you may wish to double check the manual if its DTV capable.  Lost the manual?  Try Google &#8211; there&#8217;s lots of people asking the same questions.  To to those of you with an older TV who receive your programming via antenna: YOU will need to act to keep watching TV.</p>
<p><strong>Q: Wait, is DTV the same thing as HDTV?</strong></p>
<p><strong>A:</strong> No.  DTV stands for &#8220;digital television.&#8221;  HDTV stands for &#8220;high definition television.&#8221;  All HDTV is also DTV, but not all DTV is HDTV.  The switch here isn&#8217;t entirely about HDTV &#8211; its about the way the signals are actually transmitted from station, through the air, to your home.  The signals are now going to switch from basic analog to digitally encoded and compressed for transmission &#8211; much like your computer receives video over the Internet, or like how video is written to a DVD disc.  Also much like a computer, you need to have some processing power at the receiving end to turn these digital streams back into something you can actually watch.  That&#8217;s why cable boxes, dish tuners, and new televisions solve this: they already do that converting.  Your older analog television doesn&#8217;t have the &#8220;brains&#8221; to interpret these new signals though, so you need to get a converter box to act as a middle man between the digital world and your analog TV.  As for the HDTV issue, some stations will (and already have begun) broadcasting in DTV-HDTV, but you will need an HD television to watch these in full quality.  Though, if you have an older &#8220;standard definition&#8221; television, you should notice a marked improvement in the picture and sound quality on DTV.</p>
<p><strong>Q: OK, so I have to buy a converter box to continue getting free TV with my rabbit ears?</strong></p>
<p><strong>A: </strong>Yes, you will.  Luckily, this is where that &#8220;over a billion dollars&#8221; I mentioned earlier comes in.  The government &amp; FCC is offering a $40 coupon for qualifying converter boxes.  It&#8217;s our lucky day because guess what?  Basic converter boxes don&#8217;t cost much more than $40 (and lots of places on-line are selling them for exactly $40), so there&#8217;s really no major investment to worry about &#8211; other than a little time to pick one up, and set it up.  You can apply for your coupon by calling 1-888-388-2009, or you can do it on-line at <a href="https://www.dtv2009.gov/" target="_blank">dtv2009.gov</a>.  The website explains which converters are covered, and helps you locate where to buy them as well.  There&#8217;s a catch with the coupons: you can only ask for one, and if you don&#8217;t use it within 90 days, it expires.  So only ask for one once you&#8217;re ready to use it!  If you have multiple TVs, you will need multiple boxes &#8211; but each family member may request a coupon in their name.</p>
<p><strong>Q: What about antennas?  How does the reception work?</strong></p>
<p><strong>A:</strong> This will be one area where you&#8217;ll notice a difference with DTV.  With analog television if you tune into a weak signal, you might experience a fuzzy or &#8220;snowy&#8221; picture.  If you don&#8217;t mind the &#8220;snow,&#8221; you can watch the channel.  With DTV, it&#8217;s more of an all or nothing situation.  Either you get the picture tuned in at perfect picture quality and sound, or you don&#8217;t get it at all.  The only in-between that occurs is kind of like watching a video clip on the Internet over a slow connection.  The video might skip, jump around, and freeze up.  As for antennas, the vast majority (and so far ALL stations in the Buffalo area) are using the UHF spectrum to broadcast &#8211; so if you want the best reception possible and are looking at picking up an antenna, be sure to focus on its UHF performance.  As a basic rule of thumb though, if you&#8217;re located in the city, or near by, and already pick up a decent picture on an analog station, it&#8217;s likely going to work just fine in DTV.  If you&#8217;re further out and watch those snowy pictures on a regular basis, you <em>may</em> be out of luck picking up a DTV signal without the help of an antenna upgrade.</p>
<p><strong>Q: So what actually happens on February 17, 2009?</strong></p>
<p><strong>A: </strong>There will not be any more analog television, plain and simple.  Some channels may stop before the deadline, as they did in Wilmington, but February 17th is the absolute deadline.  If you didn&#8217;t get your converter box yet and fall into the group that needs one, you won&#8217;t be able to pick up a single channel, period.  The only possible catch might be for emergency broadcasts &#8211; if there is a major emergency in the near future, you <em>might</em> still see and hear about it on the analog airwaves.  That&#8217;s not an episode of must-see-TV I&#8217;d look forward to though.</p>
<p><strong>Q: Do I have to wait until February 17 to start using DTV?</strong></p>
<p><strong>A: </strong>Nope!  The following stations in Buffalo are already broadcasting in digital:</p>
<ul>
<li>WUTV FOX, digital channel 14, UHF</li>
<li>WNLO UPN, digital channel 32, UHF</li>
<li>WGRZ NBC, digital channel 33, UHF</li>
<li>WKBW ABC, digital channel 38, UHF</li>
<li>WIVB CBS, digital channel 39, UHF</li>
<li>WNED PBS, digital channel 43, UHF</li>
</ul>
<p>There&#8217;s a lot more information available on the web if you&#8217;d like to read even more:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.dtvtransition.org/" target="_blank">DTVTransition.org</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.dtv2009.gov/FAQ.aspx" target="_blank">dtv2009.gov&#8217;s frequently asked questions</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.dtv.gov/consumercorner.html" target="_blank">Q&amp;A from the FCC</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.silicondust.com/hdhomerun/channels" target="_blank">SiliconDust&#8217;s DTV database</a> (See *all* the channels that are possible to pick up in your area, both analog and digital.  Note: This includes low power stations and signals, so don&#8217;t expect to necessarily tune in to all of these unless you have some heavy duty antenna &amp; amplifier equipment!)</li>
</ul>
<p>Lastly, if there&#8217;s any readers out there who have already picked up their converter box (or has a DTV capable set) and is picking up digital stations via broadcast, what has been your experience?  What&#8217;s your approximate location and what&#8217;s the reception there like?  Are there any other channels you&#8217;ve been able to tune in besides the ones mentioned above?  Any tips for the rest of us?  Please share in the comments below!</p>
<p>P.S. Don&#8217;t forget, if you&#8217;re at a computer with a broadband Internet connection, you could be watching <a href="http://artvoicetv.com" target="_blank">Artvoice TV</a> right now, converter box free! (yep, a shameless plug!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.artvoice.com/techvoice/2008/09/09/digital-television-in-buffalo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
