<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: T-Mobile Unveils the HTC G1: The World&#8217;s First &#8220;Android&#8221; Phone</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.artvoice.com/techvoice/2008/09/23/t-mobile-unveils-the-htc-g1-the-worlds-first-android-phone/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.artvoice.com/techvoice/2008/09/23/t-mobile-unveils-the-htc-g1-the-worlds-first-android-phone/</link>
	<description>Science, tech, computers, gadgets and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 22:36:45 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Enyedi Szilard</title>
		<link>http://blogs.artvoice.com/techvoice/2008/09/23/t-mobile-unveils-the-htc-g1-the-worlds-first-android-phone/comment-page-1/#comment-167</link>
		<dc:creator>Enyedi Szilard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 16:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.artvoice.com/techvoice/?p=209#comment-167</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think the &quot;community of users developing new applications for it&quot; aspect is so ground breaking; I&#039;m using Windows Mobile phones and there is lots of &quot;creative and innovative&quot; software for this platform. If Google, HTC and T-Mobile will control the applications to be installed on the phone, the device will be stable, but development won&#039;t be 100% free. This is iPhone-esque. If they leave the development open, they&#039;ll have what Windows Mobile has: a large developer and software base, but also incompatibility issues. In my opinion, both the iPhone and Android hype has to do with looks, not hardware/software features: the iPhone looks nicer than the HTC Diamond I&#039;m about to get; OS X (probably also Android) look better than vanilla Windows Mobile 6.1. I doubt developers will have better access to Android&#039;s functions than to OS X&#039;s or Windows Mobile&#039;s. Maybe they&#039;ll improve Android Linux, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think the &#8220;community of users developing new applications for it&#8221; aspect is so ground breaking; I&#8217;m using Windows Mobile phones and there is lots of &#8220;creative and innovative&#8221; software for this platform. If Google, HTC and T-Mobile will control the applications to be installed on the phone, the device will be stable, but development won&#8217;t be 100% free. This is iPhone-esque. If they leave the development open, they&#8217;ll have what Windows Mobile has: a large developer and software base, but also incompatibility issues. In my opinion, both the iPhone and Android hype has to do with looks, not hardware/software features: the iPhone looks nicer than the HTC Diamond I&#8217;m about to get; OS X (probably also Android) look better than vanilla Windows Mobile 6.1. I doubt developers will have better access to Android&#8217;s functions than to OS X&#8217;s or Windows Mobile&#8217;s. Maybe they&#8217;ll improve Android Linux, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
