by Greg Mach - posted 11:42 am, September 17, 2015
by Greg Mach - posted 10:12 am, May 14, 2015
Caveat: Artvoice does not do political endorsements. Nothing written in this post should be interpreted, construed, or cited as an endorsement by the owners or editors of Artvoice itself. This endorsement is mine alone. No person or campaign has directly or indirectly paid for or otherwise sponsored any post or endorsement. I do not know whether any candidate or party has ever paid for an advertisement in Artvoice, nor would I be in a position to know. I am an independent contractor and have no involvement or employment with Artvoice or its advertising or editorial staff. Any questions or issues can be directed to me at buffalopundit[at]gmail.com. I recommend you click the links – especially in NY-27. Now, on with the countdown.
United States Congress (NY-26): Brian Higgins
I did this already, I’m sure you all know.
Kathy Weppner talks nonsense, her utterings, laughable;
United States Congress (NY-27): No Endorsement
I admit that this pick came to me as a shock,
but I got information I can’t simply mock.
It shows that the Democrat, not long ago,
worked for the campaign of Paladino.
He helped with debate prep – and this made me cross –
he helped Carl defame a planned downtown mosque.
Chris Collins is there, and he’s one of the worst.
But principle matters; it ought to come first.
Chris Collins? You kidding? At least he’s consistent.
Not “Democrat now!”, but once Carl’s assistant.
The incumbent, he voted for Cruz’s shutdown,
harmed our economy and then, like a clown,
claimed to be against it, despite his own vote,
And (of course) blamed Obama, repeat, edit, rote.
But Collins was for it, before he was not;
Although Collins’ tenure has been ineffective,
I won’t back a Carl guy, he must be rejected.
Governor and Lieutenant Governor of New York State: Cuomo/Hochul
Listen, Cuomo’s got flaws, and of that I’m aware.
But Rob Astorino I just cannot bear.
His running mate – Hochul – I respect a great deal,
and the great things he’s done for our region are real.
The Buffalo Billion and Startup New York,
should not be dismissed as cheap welfare and pork.
Never before has an Albany pol,
done this much for Buffalo, as I can recall.
I do want to see much more effort to end
corrupt fusion and graft – those Albany trends.
Transparency now is the name of the game,
and Cuomo’s too secretive, to his own shame.
After all that he’s done, though, I can’t just reject,
Cuomo and Hochul, whom I hope you’ll elect.
Attorney General: Eric Schneiderman
Did you see the debate? Whoa, that Cahill’s a twit.
He screamed, interrupted, behaved like a shit.
And kudos to Bob – wow! A substantive question!
I’m voting for Schneiderman this coming election.
His office protects every one of us from,
fraud and abuse, and the criminal scum.
For those who take pills for pain they can’t stop,
Schneiderman’s strong on consumer protection,
And Cahill deserves this year’s voters’ rejection.
State Senate District 63: Tim Kennedy
Given the choice between sellout or dummy,
the outlook for voters just isn’t too sunny.
his opponent, however, should make you ask, “why…
“…would local Republicans beclown themselves so…
Kennedy may have some bridges to fix,
but Donovan? Please, voters, no, nada, nix.
State Senate District 62: Rob Ortt
Oh, great. For fuck’s sake. What a choice – I’m aghast.
Two Republicans, one Paladino backed last.
Ortt is the Mayor of North Tonawanda,
Destino’s a Dem whom I’m not wholly fond of.
and that’s generally something I can’t just write down.
– in a spurious way that I cannot abide –
and failed, like the cretins they are, by the way.
Ortt is a vet with conservative views.
When assholes supporting you campaign on hate,
it behooves you to answer with outrage, and state
something where you reject their assistance and views,
and you do it quite loudly, and make it big news.
I’m sorry you didn’t, and I hope that you’ll scorn
that loudmouthed old hater who forwards horse porn.
State Senate District 61: Elaine Altman
Hah! Mike Ranzenhofer? Career politician.
Dear reader, what was his agenda or vision?
Say “no” and do nothing, for 20-odd years?
It’s time for a change, and it’s time to switch gears.
Altman’s a teacher, she knows Common Core,
and she’ll fight to fund schools, and absolutely do more
to help out a district that’s been represented
by someone who’s done not a lot, I’ve lamented.
“Send a teacher to Albany!”, that’s where she belongs.
Ranz’s tenure in government’s two decades too long.
State Senate District 60: Not Stocker
I mean no disrespect to Dem Marc Panepinto,
I don’t mean to leave him out hanging in limbo.
A vote for the Dem would be great and just swell,
As senator, he’s been unfazed and courageous.
“Profile in Courage” would not seem outrageous.
He helped us to pass same-sex marriage, and took
a risk to pass SAFE Act after Sandy Hook.
It showed us that people don’t need a damn armory,
and schools should be havens of peace and of harmony.
So, whatever you do, and don’t think it’s a shocker
vote for anyone, just not the tea party’s Stocker.
NYS Assembly 146: Ray Walter
Did you know that Ray Walter is in a real race?
Against a young Dem with a fresh, stubbled face?
I’m sure that Steve Meyer’s an earnest young chap,
with ideas and energy. Aside from all that,
I have to agree that he’s lacking know-how,
and has yet to consider what furrows our brow.
He’s just out of school, and has loads of more time,
to get a career, pay some taxes and climb
up to a level where he really can get,
the problems that we New York families fret.
Ray and I see eye to eye on the tolls,
that the Thruway Authority always controls,
with antiquity formed in the shape of a booth,
within it a person, who I doubt, in his youth,
Imagined his life would be handing out slips.
Yet throughout the world, the traffic just zips,
through camera tolls without stopping to pay.
This dreary old system, it pisses off Ray,
So, send my friend back to fight Albany pols,
besides, the Assembly’s in firm Dem control.
For a number of races, there is no opponent.
For a real democracy, that’s a missing component.
For all of these races, you have a blank check,
I’ll note, on the side, that Ray Walter’s a friend,
and he’s running against a young Dem
But no matter what, do not let the time pass.
Just remember to vote, and Donn Esmonde’s an ass.
Kathy Weppner, for whom you should totally never vote, scored a few points on Monday.
Not against her opponent, but against the Buffalo News. She even recorded a radio ad blasting the News, because she is accusing its Washington correspondent, Jerry Zremski, of misogyny and sexism. For instance,
Hot pink nail polish?Well manicured hands?How sexist!Never had a pro manicure! Hands in dawn dish det for many years.#ChangeYourCongressman
— Kathy Weppner (@KWeppner) October 27, 2014
Here’s something I’ve not said before – Weppner has a point. When I read that passage, I thought that Zremski’s description of Weppner’s manicure was out of line; it’s simply not a way you write about a female candidate for office. But look at the passage within its context:
Looking out over Canalside from the plaza outside downtown Buffalo’s new Courtyard by Marriott on Friday, with the new HarborCenter rising to his left and his brownish hair flying every which way in the breeze, Rep. Brian Higgins talked a bit like a proud father.
“It’s campaign season, so I’ll say it: We had something to do with this,” said Higgins, a Buffalo Democrat whose strong-arming of the New York Power Authority provided the funds to begin the city’s waterfront boom.
But a day earlier at the Lake Effect Diner in University Heights, Higgins’ opponent laid two immaculately manicured hands, with 10 long hot-pink fingernails, out across a pile of paper that foretold doom of one kind or another, and spoke like a very worried mother.
The emphases are mine. Zremski described something about Higgins’ appearance, and described him as a “proud father”, and then described something about Weppner’s appearance, and described her as a “worried mother”. He was more descriptive about Weppner’s nails, admittedly.
He wasn’t blindly mocking Weppner’s fingernails – he was trying to illustrate for readers something about each candidate’s demeanor and appearance. You’ll note that no one quotes the Higgins passage, and plenty of people locally poke fun of Higgins’ sense of style.
Interestingly, the people screaming loudest about this insult are the people who scream loudest against things they call “political correctness” and the “war on women”. People like this guy:
I mean, if you’re going to be a hypocrite, I guess it’s best to do so within the same thread. But you can’t with a straight face complain about PC and then accuse someone of being a celibate or gay or whatever Bauerle’s trying to do here. Bauerle and his buds make all kinds of cracks about Higgins all the time. Their buddy Carl goes so far as to reportedly call Higgins a “cocksucker” in private, and he means it literally. That’s OK, I guess.
But does Weppner not want people to notice her nails? I mean, they neither qualify or disqualify her for office, but they’re quite palpably there.
This is a candidate who refers to women as, “girls” in a video mocking the very notion that there exists a “war on women”. Now she’s a victim of it?
She complains that she never had a professional manicure, but Zremski never said she did – he simply said they were manicured – he didn’t say who did it.
Here’s what I wrote in May about Weppner’s dismissal of the “war on women”:
The “war on women” has been coined as shorthand for policies and proposals that specifically target issues relating solely to females. These can include restrictions on reproductive rights and choices, lax enforcement of workplace anti-discrimination regulations and statutes, outrageous slut shaming of feminists who advocate for women’s rights, and still-prevalent positions held mostly be men that, for instance, women who are beaten or raped must have contributed to their own victimhood; that they brought it on themselves or “deserved” it.
It’s perfectly reasonable for people to argue about how to deal with these sorts of things from different political and moral perspectives, but it’s not reasonable to simply deny that the problems themselves exist. It’s not reasonable to suggest that it’s ok that women are treated like inferiors in the labor market, for instance.
But instead of praising the women who have worked tirelessly for decades to improve the lot of all, Weppner denigrates their fight for equality as the real “victimhood”. Was Susan B. Anthony displaying weakness when she demanded equal rights and suffrage? Were the suffragettes just playing as weakling whiners when they demanded the vote? How about the women who, in the mid-19th century, gained the right to be treated as more than mere chattel under the law?
I do like that this lecture is being delivered from an all-American kitchen with a dollar-store flag in the background. Because patriot.
Kathy Weppner, an allegedly serious person supposedly running for federal elected office, can get on the YouTubes and allege that, when women fight for equality and liberty, they’re really waging war on men. But I’ve got a transvaginal ultrasound right here that says Weppner’s wrong .
Weppner: she rejected the “war on women” before she decided it was politically expedient to become its victim.
I don’t know if I agree with the “war on women” rhetoric, but I do believe that women should be treated as equals with men. I also think that the media need to be mindful of the ways in which they describe female candidates, and Zremski’s attempt to contrast Weppner’s and Higgins’ appearance was clumsy, at best. But there’s nothing here to indicate that he was displaying any animus, or that it was in any way an attempt to de-humanize Weppner because she’s a woman. He should have simply added something more about Higgins’ appearance.
You can’t spend all your time complaining about political correctness, and then try to be politically correct. It’s either a valid concern, or it’s not.
In the end, none of this renders Weppner any more or less electable than she was on Sunday morning – i.e., not remotely.
UPDATE: Here is one of the few remaining clips of Weppner’s WBEN show that exist on the internet, courtesy of WNYMedia.net. In it, she denigrates activist Sandra Fluke for her sex toy agenda or something; “contragestives are being snuck in under the name ‘Ella'”. Sandra Fluke was famously insulted as a “slut” by Viagra huckster Rush Limbaugh for daring to suggest that contraceptives be included in health insurance policy.
When Rush Limbaugh called Sandra Fluke a “slut”, Kathy Weppner piled on. She is a hypocrite of the highest order.
Also, a commenter on Twitter suggests that it wasn’t the crack about the fingernails that was insulting, but that the juxtaposition of “proud father/worried mother” is just as troubling. I think it’s an interesting point, although I think that the whole passage was more about color commentary than about substance.
The silly radio lady – our own politically backward version of Mariann from Brooklyn, Kathy “Infected Poors” Weppner – is following up her big May hit, “Stop Common Core in NY” with this doozy that links together Islam, ISIS, and Ebola.
Remember – this is a serious candidate for Congress. Not a joke. Not at all. Now, on with the countdown.
Older Posts »