Artvoice: Buffalo's #1 Newsweekly
Home Blogs Web Features Events Weekly Features Classifieds Contact

This Modern World: Tea Party Tim and Plutocrat Pete


  • Jim Ostrowski

    OK. Listen up.

    The corporate state regime that rules us was created during and by Progressives during the Progressive Era. The plutocrats used the ideology of progressivism (now called liberalism) to cartelize the economy. They hated laissez-faire.

    The (real) tea party movement, roughly the Ron Paul wing (not the fake TEA GOP/Astroturf/Neocon wing), seeks to overthrow that regime. We are the mortal enemies of the plutocrats which is why their lapdog media has airbrushed Ron Paul out of the presidential race.

  • rastamick

    uhhh Ron’s extremism might have added an impressionistic dab or two to the lanscape here but yes by all means Tea Party Jim let’s lay this one at the feet of that damned liberal media or is it the neo con media ? either way it’s a conspiracy against allowing all Americans the right to work in unsafe places constructed without safety regs, eat tainted uninspected foods and shoot heroin in their driveway while trying to put out their house fire with a garden hose. Damn damn DAMN!!!

  • rastamick

    Listen up ? who died and made you fucking Tea bag King ?

  • Jim Ostrowski

    Typical for a liberal to avoid responding to my point, change the subject and engage in a personal attack.

  • Jim Ostrowski

    Under the 100-year old liberal regime, we have an obese nation addicted to junk food. How is that liberalism working out for you? The irony is liberals are pragmatists, genetically, but they refuse to admit the practical failure of all their programs.

  • rastamick

    Jim did I self identify as a liberal ? that’s just the n word of our era and I avoid using it. your idealogue speak is so dense and obtuse I have a hard time cracking your code. but lemme see : plutocrats turned our economy into a bunch of cartels after progressives imposed a state regime on us ( some would say they saved us from drowning but you see it your way) and now ron paul and your deregulators are going to set us free from all of this state interference – am I keeping up so far ? Part of what you all consider state interference are regulatory bodies that attempt to keep our food, air and water safe from poisions, our workplaces free of the same as well as unsafe conditions like the ones our lovely mayor’s pals subjected their workers to in asbestos removal. anywhere your free market horseshit has been tried it’s also had to incorporate torture disappearance, privatization of utilities and resources, massive unemployment and gargantuan inflation. yet you remain convinced if we do it here, (hmmmm seems we came pretty close to it from 2000 til 2008?) that all will be well and the winners will deserve to win while the losers can stand back and warm themselves at the fire. Other than asking you who the fuck you think you are commanding everyone to listen up I also fail to see any ad hominem attacks in my remark. Morgan Spurlock all ready did the fat story and has been rebuked by guys who sound a lot like you. Those reagan years were liberal as were the Nixon years and Ike ? Your 100 years has some Rosemary Woods sized gaps in it. But that’s another perk of blind idealogues they have their own opinions and their own facts. Liberals are pragmatists, genetically ? we all know big words friend but your ability to make sense with them strains credulity. Good lord. Admit your own failures and we’ll start fresh.

  • Jim Ostrowski

    You’re criticizing something you don’t understand, libertarianism. There are four pillars of libertarian thought–natural human rights, economics, revisionist history and public choice theory. Since you appear not to be familiar with any of the four, dialogue of this nature is pointless. I suggest you go to Mises.org and familiarize yourself with libertarianism and then we can talk further.