Comments on: West Side Neighborhood Housing Services http://blogs.artvoice.com/avdaily/2008/11/28/west-side-neighborhood-housing-services/ News & Commentary from the Artvoice Editorial staff Sat, 21 Nov 2009 22:04:18 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: Mike Flynn http://blogs.artvoice.com/avdaily/2008/11/28/west-side-neighborhood-housing-services/comment-page-1/#comment-3726 Mike Flynn Mon, 08 Dec 2008 13:14:49 +0000 http://blogs.artvoice.com/avdaily/?p=1374#comment-3726 So this is the list, that list which was to show the takeover by "City Hall" (I suspect every time this is said there is ominous music playing somehwere?) 112 members - 23 highlighted, about 21%. Of the highlighted, 7 are long-standing members, now down to 16, or about 15%. Of the 23, many are WS residents and should have an innate right to be a member, regardless of employee. So how do these numbers mean a "take-over" by city hall? Surely there is some math whiz in the Garrett camp who can provide me with the necessary understanding? Could it really be that people, not me, but "people", those poor, brain-washed sycophants of the NHS, felt Harvey, a non-member, was not the right candidate? Harvey lost that evening by 17-2, so the brouhaha began because Geoff could not find another story with more facts to support it? Maybe the combo of Geoff and Laura Kelly can make sense of this as they get Geoff on the way to his Pulitzer Prize for invetigative reporting? So this is the list, that list which was to show the takeover by “City Hall” (I suspect every time this is said there is ominous music playing somehwere?) 112 members – 23 highlighted, about 21%. Of the highlighted, 7 are long-standing members, now down to 16, or about 15%. Of the 23, many are WS residents and should have an innate right to be a member, regardless of employee. So how do these numbers mean a “take-over” by city hall? Surely there is some math whiz in the Garrett camp who can provide me with the necessary understanding? Could it really be that people, not me, but “people”, those poor, brain-washed sycophants of the NHS, felt Harvey, a non-member, was not the right candidate? Harvey lost that evening by 17-2, so the brouhaha began because Geoff could not find another story with more facts to support it?

Maybe the combo of Geoff and Laura Kelly can make sense of this as they get Geoff on the way to his Pulitzer Prize for invetigative reporting?

]]>